US to make nuclear war more likely – OpEd – Eurasia Review

The United States is on its way to a much more likely first use of nuclear weapons, with news that the Air Force has “completed flight tests” of the cost-ridden F35A Lightning fighter. performance, all units of which are “upgraded”. “Carry thermonuclear weapons.

What this means, as explained in a new article from Popular Mechanics, is that the world’s most expensive weapons program (at $ 1.7 trillion), a fifth-generation, supposedly “invisible “To radar (which in fact cannot fight and is not invisible to advanced radars), now has a new mission to justify its existence and the continuation of its production: to drop switchable” tactical “nuclear weapons which can also be as small as 0.3 kilotons or up to 50 kilotons in explosive power.

Now 0.3 kilotons is “just” the equivalent of 300 tons of dynamite, which makes them supposedly “usable”, i.e. not responsible for the Holocaust (assuming a country supporting the targeted country does not decide to respond in kind and we will meanwhile, reaching its maximum power of 50 kilotons, each F35A bomb would be much more than twice as powerful as the nuclear bomb that leveled Nagasaki.

The Popular mechanics The article, also published in Yahoo News, quotes Pentagon sources as saying that the new capability of the F35A gives the United States the flexibility to deliver nuclear weapons to targets in a country threatening the United States, and also to recall them until ‘at the last second before dropping the gun since the plane would be flown. But this supposed benefit of a manned, recallable delivery system is a fantasy.

As Daniel Ellsberg detailed in his 2017 book, The Doomsday Machine, writes based on his decades of working with a senior security clearance on behalf of the Office of the Secretary of Defense investigating the procedures and practices of command and control of the country’s nuclear forces, there are no way to guarantee that a pilot in charge of a nuclear strike mission will receive – or believe – any message or signal ordering the cancellation of the attack order.

As Ellsberg explains, communications systems fail almost daily at one of hundreds of US military bases and aircraft carrier battle groups. cut of the link between Washington and remote military bases, due to equipment malfunctions, storms, solar flares, etc. Additionally, in times of international crisis, a pilot may be leery of even an order to cancel an attack which, after all, will not be a phone call from the President, a Pentagon general, or even from a known base commander, but rather from a short coded signal. As Ellsberg notes in his terrifying book, the other flaw is that a pilot, once charged with such a mission, could decide in the heat of the moment, to simply continue with the orders and drop his gun. regardless of receipt of a cancellation order. Remember that in times of crisis, countries may use jamming systems to disable enemy military communications, or could even blind communications satellites.

Meanwhile, the scenario presented in the article – an isolated pilot sent to deliver one or two switchable B61-12 thermonuclear weapons to a command and control center or missile launch site, perhaps – is not not quite what Pentagon strategists have in mind for its F-35A planes.

In fact, hundreds of these Air Force versions of the F-35 underwent so-called “block four” modifications, with bulging fairings replacing their sleek old bodies, to allow the transport of two hydrogen bombs stretched out to the sky. inside their fuselages, where they won’t present a larger radar image like bombs carried outside under wings. These reconfigured aircraft, which also feature software upgrades to allow them to prime, unlock and release their two nuclear weapons, are delivered to forward bases near Russia and China within the aircraft’s relatively short range. loaded with bombs.

The idea (hopefully wishful thinking) is that such planes, armed with their two nuclear weapons, could cross a Russian and / or Chinese border at supersonic speed, flying low on the ground, to strike government buildings, military bases. and missile silos. in a surprise strike, leaving the target country unable to retaliate.

For American military policymakers, from the late post-war 1940s through the 1950s and beyond, eliminating America’s nuclear-weapon rivals in a pre-emptive atomic blitz has long been a strategic dream, still postponed fortunately due to lingering fears. among healthier heads that such a criminal and genocidal attack would not prevent a counterattack.

Bernie Sanders, the self-described independent “socialist” senator from Vermont, must now end his own stubborn and cynical support for the 18 F-35A base at Burlington International Airport, where pilots from The Vermont Air National Guard are now training for exactly the types of bombing scenarios described above.

Sanders insisted that he “opposes” the “wasteful” F35 program, but that it is a “done deal” and therefore wants the Air National Guard unit of Vermont gets some of the “benefits” of having it and the “jobs” that he supposedly brings with her to her state. He continued to cover up, claiming that the Vermont F35As will not carry nuclear weapons or be used in nuclear war. In fact, his office was caught modifying a Pentagon document to hide the fact that Vermont Guard’a planes would definitely be upgraded with the “block four” modifications so that they could carry nuclear weapons like any other. F-35A in the Air Force Fleet.

Vermont planes were unwilling and unable to fly from Burlington over the North Pole to deliver their bombs to Russian or Chinese targets except with multiple air-to-air refueling sessions, and while flying at subsonic speeds for save fuel, avoiding any chance of a “surprise” attack. But they could, if pilots are trained (as they will be) to use the modernized planes to transport their nuclear cargo and drop them on targets, be activated during a time of international crisis. The plan would then be for US-based pilots to transport their F-35A planes to forward bases, where the nuclear bombs would be stored. The planes and their pilots would then be pre-positioned, to join in a potential attack, or to create a sense of imminent threat that would supposedly lead the enemy – say Russia or China – to retreat, or launch an attack. first his own attack. .

With the word the Air Force is ready to begin the full-scale upgrade of its fleet from F35A to nuclear-capable bombers, Senator Sanders must execute a red face about-face and demand the immediate withdrawal of the F35A jets from Vermont. It must also stop hypocritically supporting the continued production and Block-Four upgrade of this aircraft.

Let us be clear: a fleet of fighter-bombers equipped with nuclear weapons and avoiding radars can in no way be conceived as a weapon of “retaliation”. If Russia or China, the only countries that might even consider launching a first strike against the United States, did, have a plane that could hit command and control centers, missile silos, and military bases. in the attacking country would be useless. First of all, these planes would have already been smashed to the ground during the initial enemy attack. Second, if they somehow survived to take off, the national political and military leaders of any country launching such an attack would have long moved to protective hidden locations once they ordered their attack. , the troops would have been moved from their inevitably targeted bases with their equipment and the missile silos would be empty holes, their rockets having already been launched. Additionally, enemy countries would be on high alert looking for any incoming F35s or other bombers and would have their anti-aircraft missile arrays ready to fire, and their combat defenses already in the air on high alert for bring down the heavily laden and inevitably hurt. incoming armed American planes.

It’s a big lie in other words, for the Pentagon to claim that these planes make the world a safer place by including a pilot.

As a first-strike weapon, the F35A, capable of operating a nuclear bomb, simply increases the chances of a war being started by the United States, if Pentagon strategists start to believe they have a window. opportunity to strike without fear of significant retaliation.

It also leaves the other more likely risk: that this nuclear-capable fighter could be used to deliver a “small nuclear weapon” against a non-nuclear nation – one of many where US military forces are constantly engaged in non-nuclear wars. declared as Syria, Iraq, Yemen, Afghanistan, Somalia, Niger, Philippines, etc. The consequences of such a use of a nuclear weapon against a non-nuclear nation, opening the door to the widespread use of nuclear weapons in virtually any armed conflict, could be as profound as the first use of this was. type against non-nuclear Japan by arrogant United States at the end of WWII.

These two bombings of two non-military targets, wiping out two major Japanese cities, directly led to a multigenerational, multibillion-dollar arms race between the United States and the Soviet Union, and ultimately China as well, and spread nuclear weapons to seven other nations.

This latest escalation in nuclear weapons, creating a fleet of more than a thousand stealth fighter-bombers carrying nuclear weapons, will inevitably lead to the development of similar aircraft in Russia, China and elsewhere (China has already created a stealth fighter very similar to the F-35, and Russia, which has a very advanced aircraft design capability, will certainly follow suit). Relentless efforts at incalculable cost. by the United States to provide a viable first-strike capability also requires the Russians and Chinese to respond with alternative deterrent weapons, including hypersonic cruise missiles capable of autonomously changing direction and moving targets while flying at thousands of miles an hour, are not first-strike weapons, given the relatively longer time it would take to reach their targets.

Despite all the breaths and puffs of air from media alarmists, the hypersonic missiles tested by Russia and China are defensive weapons designed to incite a nation like the United States openly seeking a first-strike offensive possibility, think about it. -y two times before launching such a holocaust. .

Deterrence is decidedly not what are the upgrades of the F35A nuclear bomber. The best that can be hoped for is that this bomber upgrade is just the latest in a series of plans from the Pentagon, F35 maker Lockheed-Martin and all of the Congressional backers of the company taking bribes from the company, to keep that $ 1.7 trillion sauce train going. for that epic mess of a sinking plane.

Source link

About Theresa Burton

Check Also

Israeli Air Force F-16A sidestick that hit Osirak nuclear reactor during Operation Opera up for auction

F-16A’s side-stick controller # 78-0322 is up for auction. The Israeli Air Force veteran was …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *